On Thursday 26 November 2009 14:49:56 ext Andy Walls wrote: > > Peter, > > I would suspect using a single-threaded workqueue is better than a > wake_up() of another thread. IIRC, after queuing work, the workqueue's > single thread may run almost immediately on the same processor. With > waking up sleeping threads, I've run into scheduler delays around 10 ms > on a dual core x86_64 desktop system. Hello Andy, I have sent the patch which changes from rt to singlethread, I hope it fixes the breakage in linux-next. In short testing, when there is virtually no load on the system I can not see any difference, which might change later. But I'll keep in mind that probably I'm not going to better off with the waking up of a sleeping thread. > > Regards, > Andy Thanks, Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
