* Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 11/26/2009 05:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Please submit scheduler patches to the scheduler tree. Such level of > > refactoring of a critical scheduler component needs to go through the > > regular scheduler channels. This is a frequently modified piece of code > > and conflicts are likely in the future. > > Sure, which sched/* branch should I base these patches on? You could send the patch you rely on standalone (it seems to be a single patch) and we can look at applying it to the scheduler tree. That reduces the conflicts on an ongoing basis. Please Cc: PeterZ and Mike Galbraith as well. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
