On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:36:48 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:23:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the edac-amd tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c because commit
> > 4de1ce0c99ff838090d3b57cab8bc6eeb303dda5
> > ("cpumask:amd64_edac-cpumask_t-remove") from the rr tree and commit
> > 2fd9af91b92c10e58993f9eb70300fdff32698fb ("cpumask: use modern cpumask
> > style in drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c") from the edac-amd tree are the same
> > patch but there are further changes in the edac-amd tree. So, Rusty, I
> > guess you can drop that patch (unless something later in the rr tree
> > depends on it).
>
> yes, we agreed I should pick up this patch. Rusty?
Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
