On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:40:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:51:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20091111: > > > > The cpufreq tree gained a conflict against the acpi tree. > > when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n: > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.o: In function `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit': > (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit' > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here > > > The function definition in include/apci/procssor.h needs to be "static inline" > at line 323. --- however, even with that fixed, when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y CONFIG_ACPI=n CONFIG_SFI=y CONFIG_APM=y there is this build error: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c:720: error: 'acpi_processor_get_bios_limit' undeclared here (not in a function) --- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
