Re: [PATCH 9/9] pcmcia: remove pcmcia_get_{first,next}_tuple()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg,

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:39:23AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:12:24AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > Randy,
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 03:19:58PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > Remove the pcmcia_get_{first,next}_tuple() calls no longer needed by
> > > > (current) pcmcia device drivers.
> > > 
> > > linux-next 20091026:
> > > 
> > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_das16_cs.c:155: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcmcia_get_first_tuple'
> > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_das16_cs.c:156: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcmcia_get_tuple_data'
> > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_das16_cs.c:883: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcmcia_get_next_tuple'
> > > 
> > > There are also other comedi/ drivers that this randconfig didn't attempt
> > > to build that are still using these same interfaces.
> > 
> > What are the current rules on drivers in staging/ ? Do they need to be
> > updated as well on API changes?
> 
> You don't have to do it, no.  I'll be glad to do so as long as I get a
> hint as to what needs to be done :)

These hints are in Documentation/pcmcia/driver-changes.txt . However, I'll
try to get some patches cooked up myself tonight for those drivers. Whom
shall I submit them to, or shall I just add them to the PCMCIA tree?

Best,
	Dominik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux