> From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dtor@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:48 PM > To: pv-drivers@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Randy Dunlap; Bhavesh Davda; Stephen Rothwell; netdev; LKML; linux- > next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; David Miller > Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH -next] vmxnet3: use dev_dbg, fix build > for CONFIG_BLOCK=n > > Hi Randy, > > On Thursday 15 October 2009 03:42:49 pm Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Bhavesh Davda wrote: > > > Who ever compiles with CONFIG_BLOCK=n? Just kidding... > > > > or why does networking need CONFIG_BLOCK at all? ;) > > > > > Thanks again for making this change! Ship it! > > > > So could I have used adapter->netdev->dev or adapter->pdev->dev ? > > either of them? are they the same? > > > > They are the same. Right: vmxnet3_probe_device(struct pci_dev *pdev,...) struct net_device *netdev; ... netdev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(struct vmxnet3_adapter)); ... pci_set_drvdata(pdev, netdev); adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); adapter->netdev = netdev; adapter->pdev = pdev; - Bhavesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
