* Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 02:23:28PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the i7core_edac tree got a conflict in
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c between commit
> > f436f8bb73138bc74eb1c6527723e00988ad8a8a ("x86: EDAC: MCE: Fix MCE
> > decoding callback logic") from Linus' tree and commit
> > 699a7dbe1ffdf4b25c1475e45590b181c3e23087 ("edac_mce: Add an interface
> > driver to report mce errors via edac") from the i7core_edac tree.
>
> The current way Ingo suggested is using an atomic notifier instead
> from within print_mce to convey MCE info to an EDAC driver, see
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125455310112745&w=2
>
> Ingo, what are your plans with that? I'm guessing the .33 timeframe?
yeah, that looks like .33 material. (unless it fixes a regression)
I have queued it up in tip:x86/mce.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
