Re: linux-next: suspend tree build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:31:55 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the notification.
> > 
> > Did you cross-compile it by chance?  It builds for me on native x86_64 with
> > allmodconfig, which is why I missed this issue.
> 
> I cross compile all my x86 builds as my big machines are all PowerPC.
> 
> > > I have used the version of the suspend tree from next-20091002 for today.
> > 
> > I added the #include <linux/compiler.h> to freezer.h, but obviously I couldn't
> > verify if that fixed the problem.  Hopefully it did.
> 
> My guess was wrong.  You either need to leave the __cold off the
> definition in kernel/freezer.c or move it before the function name.  No
> other function definition in the kernel is marked __cold, but several
> declarations are.
> 
> Also __cold only generates something for gcc >= 4.3 ...  I am using 4.4.

OK, I've dropped the patch altogether for now, will add it later.

Just pushed the updated tree.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux