On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 20:34, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 19:44, Greg KH wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:00:53PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> A bunch of places assumed pointers were 32-bits in size (bit checking and >>> debug output), but none of these affected runtime functionality. >>> >>> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This patch doesn't apply to my tree, what did you make it against? > > it was reported against next, so i used that so what tree do i need to use to get you to merge this ? i'm guessing the semantic patch was what caused conflicts (my proposed patch already included that fix, but too late now). -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
