Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ocfs2 tree with Linus' tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:45:37AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the ocfs2 tree got conflicts in
> arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S, arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h,
> arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h and arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S
> between various commits from Linus' tree and commit
> 25767b48501de19421ae86c406b2dd42df37baf3 ("fs: Add the reflink()
> operation and reflinkat(2) system call") from the ocfs2 tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for a short while.  Given
> the ongoing discussions about this patch with Linus, however, it may be
> worth dropping for now?

	The syscall is dropping while it's reworked.  I should have a
tree up shortly without the syscall.

Joel

-- 

Life's Little Instruction Book #15

	"Own a great stereo system."

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux