Hi Mike,
Today's linux-next merge of the blackfin tree got a conflict in
arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c between commit
b9bf3121af348d9255f1c917830fe8c2df52efcb ("percpu: use
DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED()") from Linus' tree and commit
40bf94d6d1158fb6d6d67a666e6b16ab6ac3986e ("Blackfin: push SRAM locks down
into related ifdefs") from the blackfin tree.
The latter moved the code that the former modified. I fixed it up (see
below) and can carry the fix for a while.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
diff --cc arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c
index 99e4dbb,e095094..0000000
--- a/arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c
+++ b/arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c
@@@ -55,6 -50,7 +50,7 @@@ struct sram_piece
struct sram_piece *next;
};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, l1sram_lock) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
++static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(spinlock_t, l1sram_lock);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece, free_l1_ssram_head);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece, used_l1_ssram_head);
@@@ -68,7 -64,12 +64,12 @@@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece, used_l1_data_B_sram_head);
#endif
+ #if L1_DATA_A_LENGTH || L1_DATA_B_LENGTH
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, l1_data_sram_lock) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
++static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(spinlock_t, l1_data_sram_lock);
+ #endif
+
#if L1_CODE_LENGTH != 0
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, l1_inst_sram_lock) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
++static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(spinlock_t, l1_inst_sram_lock);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece, free_l1_inst_sram_head);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sram_piece, used_l1_inst_sram_head);
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
