Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 15:52 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
> 
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:40:51 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> > include/linux/rcupdate.h between commit
> > 249acdd3fd13d1ec579ff9b1c5273cf5515cd352 ("SLQB slab allocator (try 2)")
> > from the slab tree and commit 03b042bf1dc14a268a3d65d38b4ec2a4261e8477
> > ("rcu: Add synchronize_sched_expedited() primitive") from the tip tree.
> > 
> > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.
> 
> This conflict is now between the slab tree and Linus' tree.

OK, thanks Stephen, I'll fix it up in my tree.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux