On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:56, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig) produced this warning:
>
> kernel/sched.c:122: warning: 'double_rq_lock' declared 'static' but never defined
>
> Introduced by commit 18a3885fc1ffa92c2212ff0afdf033403d5b0fa0 ("sched:
> Remove reciprocal for cpu_power"). This is a build with CONFIG_SMP
> undefined.
Yep. same here.
It's even more fishy:
- double_rq_lock() is useded inside #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
- double_rq_lock() is defined inside #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- double_rq_lock() is used inside #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
