* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced these warning: > > In file included from include/trace/ftrace.h:285, > from include/trace/define_trace.h:61, > from include/trace/events/timer.h:342, > from kernel/timer.c:50: > include/trace/events/timer.h: In function 'ftrace_raw_output_itimer_state': > include/trace/events/timer.h:280: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'cputime_t' > include/trace/events/timer.h: In function 'ftrace_raw_output_itimer_expire': > include/trace/events/timer.h:317: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'cputime_t' Should be harmless with no runtime effects - the fix would be to harmonize the cputime_t types across architectures. > Introduced by commit 3f0a525ebf4b8ef041a332bbe4a73aee94bb064b ("timers: Add tracepoints for itimer") from the tip tree. > > cputime_t is variously "u64", "unsigned long long" and "unsigned > long" on different architectures. Should be unsigned long i think. Most architectures use it as unsigned long via include/asm-generic/cputime.h, except these three: arch/ia64/include/asm/cputime.h:typedef u64 cputime_t; arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h:typedef u64 cputime_t; arch/s390/include/asm/cputime.h:typedef unsigned long long cputime_t; Or we could eliminate the type altogether as well and standardize on u64. Thomas? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html