Hi Stephen, On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:19:35 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jean, > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:234: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:537: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c: In function 'i2c_register_adapter': > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:603: error: implicit declaration of function 'class_compat_create_link' > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c: In function 'i2c_del_adapter': > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:789: error: implicit declaration of function 'class_compat_remove_link' > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c: In function 'i2c_init': > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:999: error: implicit declaration of function 'class_compat_register' > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:999: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:1012: error: implicit declaration of function 'class_compat_unregister' > > I have used the i2c tree from next-20090828 for today. These are caused by the fact that I moved the patch adding class_compat_create_link() and friends out of the NEXT_PATCHES section. I did so because Greg KH (Cc'd) added this patch to his driver-core patch set, which I thought was part of linux-next. I simply didn't want to apply the same patch twice. To clarify the dependency, I added the following to my series.conf: # NEXT_BASE driver-core.current but apparently it didn't work as intended. Greg, please clarify whether the patch in question (driver-core-add-support-for-compatibility-classes.patch) is pushed to linux-next or not. Stephen, if my dependency tag is not correct, please tell me how to fix it. Thanks, and sorry for the trouble. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
