Re: linux-next: ground rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 06:02:46PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> [This email has been bcc'd to all the current contributors to
> linux-next.  No response is required unless you have some issue with the
> following.]
> 
> Thanks for being a participant of linux-next.  I have been asked by my 
> employer to send you this e-mail summarizing these "ground rules" for the 
> project:
> 
> The linux-next integration testing is not a judgment of your code.  The 
> purpose of linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact 
> of conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 
> 
> You need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have been:
>      * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
> 	Signed-off-by,
>      * posted to the relevant mailing list,
>      * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
>      * successfully unit tested, and 
>      * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
> 
> Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
> to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

ACK (if that helps!)

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx			might be all we have.  Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux