On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:05 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:58:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the nfsd tree got a conflict in
> > net/sunrpc/cache.c between commit
> > 173912a6add00f4715774dcecf9ee53274c5924c ("SUNRPC: Move procfs-specific
> > stuff out of the generic sunrpc cache code") from the nfs tree and commit
> > f866a8194f7cbabb9135b98b9ac7d26237b88367 ("sunrpc/cache: rename
> > queue_loose to cache_dequeue") from the nfsd tree.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> Looks like there may be some less trivial conflicts now, though. Trond,
> maybe you could rebase the cache stuff against my latest for-2.6.32?
I've merged your for-2.6.32 into a dedicated sunrpc_cache-for_next topic
branch and pushed that out as part of the NFS client linux-next.
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx
www.netapp.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
