On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:35:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Alan, > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:29:11 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I need to look at the actual diff, but the combination looks completely > > bogus unless I'm misreading the fixup which is possible. > > Below is the actual patch from the usb.current tree. Thanks - ok that is probably safe. The change I was worried about (the error paths not adjusting port->count are ok as it gets zeroed within the mutex) Not sure its safe versus hangup but neither was the old code 8) Oliver: I'll send you an alternative patch later today/tomorrow that uses the ASYNC flags. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
