Hi Lars, On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:51:56 +0200 Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stephen: expect an explicit linux-next merge request > within the next few days. OK, just to be clear your tree should be based on Linus' tree (or some other *stable*, non rebasing, tree - *not* linux-next). [I guess your tree will fulfill all the following] What I tell everyone: all patches/commits in the tree/series must have been: posted to a relevant mailing list reviewed unit tested destined for the next merge window (or the current release) *before* they are included. The linux-next tree is for integration testing and to lower the impact of conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpDsRdOtZYiH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
