On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:53 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:17 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > Is it possible to get this patch through and before 2.6.31 stable is > > released ? > Hi David, > Hm, I was ignoring this until I was sure all the last-minute fixes for > 2.6.31 were out of the way; I was planning to submit it for 2.6.32. > > Do we really need to submit it for 2.6.31? It's not a regression, is it? > It's been like this for _ages_. True. But it gives annoying build fails on randconfig next trees. And we(Sachin & myself) has been reporting it from March/April. If you feel there is still room to be pushed to 2.6.31, then please do it. Else, 2.6.32 will be fine. Thanks for your support. Regards-- Subrata > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
