Hi Jens, On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:38:46 +0200 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That is correct! I have just now updated for-next as well, so your next > pull should lose this fixup. Except you left the call to wakeup_pdflush(0) in there ... I will fix that up while Christoph's concerns are addressed. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpodaklfPCN5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
