Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] ring-buffer: Really make it generic.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 14:30 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> In hunting down the cause for the hwlat_detector ring buffer spew in
> my failed -next builds it became obvious that folks are now treating
> ring_buffer as something that is generic independent of tracing and thus,
> suitable for public driver consumption.
> 
> Given that there are only a few minor areas in ring_buffer that have any
> reliance on CONFIG_TRACING or CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER, provide stubs for
> those and make it generally available.

Thanks for this. I had discussed it with Steven previously and I can't
imagine why he wouldn't be in favor of wider use - I suggested that it's
about time ring_buffer moved out of trace/ and got it's own place (it's
getting to be a big boy now, full of youthful aspiration) but we'll have
to wait for him to get back from his trip and let us know what he wants.

Jon.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux