On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:24:08AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:13:44AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > ERROR: "clk_enable" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "clk_disable" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "clk_put" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "clk_get_rate" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.ko] undefined! > > ERROR: "clk_get" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.ko] undefined! > > > > Caused by commit 1ab52cf910bbbee92861227e6ed77c56b1dc233c ("i2c: driver > > for the Synopsys DesignWare I2C controller") from Linus' tree which I > > have reverted for today. > > So, what is the right configuration symbol to depend on for the clk API? > CONFIG_HAVE_CLK. > A short archives search led to the "provide a dummy implementation of the clk > API" patch from Uwe Kleine-K?nig > (http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0804.2/2748.html). Is this the > right solution? > Something like this would be better handled in include/linux/clk.h. One of the things to watch out for is clk_get_rate(), there are cases in the kernel where the rate is fetched with clk_get_rate() and then subsequently used as a divisor in some other equation. clk_get_rate() probably ought to WARN_ON(1) unconditionally, as any driver wanting rate information is going to need proper clock information. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html