Hi Len,
This conflict is now between Linus' tree and the acpi tree as Dave's net
tree has been merged upstream.
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:29:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless tree got a conflict in
> drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c between commit
> bd134968b9c14d3631e9e33599b27cef0e4d884e ("eeepc-laptop: rfkill
> refactoring") from the acpi tree and commit
> 96e9cfeb9692b0bc6e03f9b6f9cb3c67a40b76d1 ("eeepc-laptop: read rfkill
> soft-blocked state on resume") from the wireless tree.
>
> The former changed the names of some structure entries that the latter
> used. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for a while.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> diff --cc drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
> index 67ad360,8153b3e..0000000
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
> @@@ -191,7 -180,7 +191,8 @@@ static struct key_entry eeepc_keymap[]
> */
> static int eeepc_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device);
> static int eeepc_hotk_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type);
> +static void eeepc_hotk_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event);
> + static int eeepc_hotk_resume(struct acpi_device *device);
>
> static const struct acpi_device_id eeepc_device_ids[] = {
> {EEEPC_HOTK_HID, 0},
> @@@ -207,7 -195,7 +208,8 @@@ static struct acpi_driver eeepc_hotk_dr
> .ops = {
> .add = eeepc_hotk_add,
> .remove = eeepc_hotk_remove,
> + .notify = eeepc_hotk_notify,
> + .resume = eeepc_hotk_resume,
> },
> };
>
> @@@ -645,30 -514,14 +647,27 @@@ static int notify_brn(void
> return -1;
> }
>
> +static int eeepc_get_adapter_status(struct hotplug_slot *hotplug_slot,
> + u8 *value)
> +{
> + int val = get_acpi(CM_ASL_WLAN);
> +
> + if (val == 1 || val == 0)
> + *value = val;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> - static void eeepc_rfkill_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> + static void eeepc_rfkill_hotplug(void)
> {
> struct pci_dev *dev;
> struct pci_bus *bus = pci_find_bus(0, 1);
> bool blocked;
>
> - if (event != ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK)
> - return;
> -
> if (!bus) {
> - printk(EEEPC_WARNING "Unable to find PCI bus 1?\n");
> + pr_warning("Unable to find PCI bus 1?\n");
> return;
> }
>
> @@@ -694,10 -547,18 +693,18 @@@
> }
> }
>
> - rfkill_set_sw_state(ehotk->eeepc_wlan_rfkill, blocked);
> + rfkill_set_sw_state(ehotk->wlan_rfkill, blocked);
> }
>
> + static void eeepc_rfkill_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> + {
> + if (event != ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK)
> + return;
> +
> + eeepc_rfkill_hotplug();
> + }
> +
> -static void eeepc_hotk_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
> +static void eeepc_hotk_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
> {
> static struct key_entry *key;
> u16 count;
> @@@ -869,6 -741,33 +876,33 @@@ static int eeepc_hotk_remove(struct acp
> return 0;
> }
>
> + static int eeepc_hotk_resume(struct acpi_device *device)
> + {
> - if (ehotk->eeepc_wlan_rfkill) {
> ++ if (ehotk->wlan_rfkill) {
> + bool wlan;
> +
> + /* Workaround - it seems that _PTS disables the wireless
> + without notification or changing the value read by WLAN.
> + Normally this is fine because the correct value is restored
> + from the non-volatile storage on resume, but we need to do
> + it ourself if case suspend is aborted, or we lose wireless.
> + */
> + wlan = get_acpi(CM_ASL_WLAN);
> + set_acpi(CM_ASL_WLAN, wlan);
> +
> - rfkill_set_sw_state(ehotk->eeepc_wlan_rfkill,
> ++ rfkill_set_sw_state(ehotk->wlan_rfkill,
> + wlan != 1);
> +
> + eeepc_rfkill_hotplug();
> + }
> +
> - if (ehotk->eeepc_bluetooth_rfkill)
> - rfkill_set_sw_state(ehotk->eeepc_bluetooth_rfkill,
> ++ if (ehotk->bluetooth_rfkill)
> ++ rfkill_set_sw_state(ehotk->bluetooth_rfkill,
> + get_acpi(CM_ASL_BLUETOOTH) != 1);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Hwmon
> */
> @@@ -1029,75 -922,6 +1063,75 @@@ static void __exit eeepc_laptop_exit(vo
> platform_driver_unregister(&platform_driver);
> }
>
> +static int eeepc_new_rfkill(struct rfkill **rfkill,
> + const char *name, struct device *dev,
> + enum rfkill_type type, int cm)
> +{
> + int result;
> +
> + result = get_acpi(cm);
> + if (result < 0)
> + return result;
> +
> + *rfkill = rfkill_alloc(name, dev, type,
> + &eeepc_rfkill_ops, (void *)(unsigned long)cm);
> +
> + if (!*rfkill)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> - rfkill_set_sw_state(*rfkill, get_acpi(cm) != 1);
> ++ rfkill_init_sw_state(*rfkill, get_acpi(cm) != 1);
> + result = rfkill_register(*rfkill);
> + if (result) {
> + rfkill_destroy(*rfkill);
> + *rfkill = NULL;
> + return result;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int eeepc_rfkill_init(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int result = 0;
> +
> + eeepc_register_rfkill_notifier("\\_SB.PCI0.P0P6");
> + eeepc_register_rfkill_notifier("\\_SB.PCI0.P0P7");
> +
> + result = eeepc_new_rfkill(&ehotk->wlan_rfkill,
> + "eeepc-wlan", dev,
> + RFKILL_TYPE_WLAN, CM_ASL_WLAN);
> +
> + if (result && result != -ENODEV)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + result = eeepc_new_rfkill(&ehotk->bluetooth_rfkill,
> + "eeepc-bluetooth", dev,
> + RFKILL_TYPE_BLUETOOTH, CM_ASL_BLUETOOTH);
> +
> + if (result && result != -ENODEV)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + result = eeepc_new_rfkill(&ehotk->wwan3g_rfkill,
> + "eeepc-wwan3g", dev,
> + RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN, CM_ASL_3G);
> +
> + if (result && result != -ENODEV)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + result = eeepc_setup_pci_hotplug();
> + /*
> + * If we get -EBUSY then something else is handling the PCI hotplug -
> + * don't fail in this case
> + */
> + if (result == -EBUSY)
> + result = 0;
> +
> +exit:
> + if (result && result != -ENODEV)
> + eeepc_rfkill_exit();
> + return result;
> +}
> +
> static int eeepc_backlight_init(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct backlight_device *bd;
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpTHYTf5XoTn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
