Hi Arnd,
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:05:32 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Friday 12 June 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in
> > include/asm-generic/atomic.h between commit
> > 53e111a730ea8b002d57dd226098c12789993329 ("x86: Fix atomic_long_xchg() on
> > 64bit") from Linus' tree and commit
> > 72099ed2719fc5829bd79c6ca9d1783ed026eb37 ("asm-generic: rename atomic.h
> > to atomic-long.h") from the asm-generic tree.
> >
> > I applied the fix from the former patch to atomic-long.h
>
> I pulled Linus' tree into the asm-generic tree now and fixed the two conflicts
> in the same way you did. I thought about doing a rebase on his tree instead,
> but wasn't sure what works better.
I think what works better is what you are most comfortable with. Your
way works fine for me. Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpDb29GxcLi1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
