On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 09:55:52AM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 08:28:33AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > drivers/base/devtmpfs.c:41: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfs_mkdir' > > drivers/base/devtmpfs.c:46: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > > [...] > > Why is devtmpfs in linux-next? My read of the thread so far seems to > indicate there is considerable uncertainty that this is necessary or > desirable. As we discussed on irc, I think you no longer object to this, and see how it solves a real problem, and can probably help out your initramfs tools. So it should stay in -next for now, and see if any build/use problems happen with it. I've been running it all this week on my machines just fine. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
