Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:53:30AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Greg KH wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:44:47AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> Greg KH wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:18:20AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>>>> Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Greg, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> drivers/usb/built-in.o: In function `.handle_event': >>>>>>> (.text+0x67dd0): multiple definition of `.handle_event' >>>>>>> drivers/pcmcia/built-in.o:(.text+0xcfcc): first defined here >>>>>>> drivers/usb/built-in.o: In function `handle_event': >>>>>>> (.opd+0x5bc8): multiple definition of `handle_event' >>>>>>> drivers/pcmcia/built-in.o:(.opd+0xed0): first defined here >>>>>> There's also this one: >>>>>> >>>>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c:46: error: implicit declaration of function 'dma_pool_alloc' >>>>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c:69: error: implicit declaration of function 'dma_pool_free' >>>>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c:578: error: implicit declaration of function 'dma_pool_destroy' >>>>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c:657: error: implicit declaration of function 'dma_pool_create' >>>>>> >>>>>> That file needs to >>>>>> #include <linux/dmapool.h> >>>>> What arch had this problem? >>>> i386 >>> I can't duplicate this here, care to attach a .config? >> attached. But you don't need to be able to duplicate it. >> >> The source file obviously uses those interfaces, so it should >> include that header file. > > Ah, it's a PCI config issue, a Kbuild change will fix this. So I noticed, but it should still #include the header file since those interfaces are used. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
