On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 13:18 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > OK thanks. So I think we have 2 problems. One with MAX_ORDER <= 9 > that is fixed by the previous patch, and another which is probably > due to having no memory on node 0 which I will take another look > at now. > > We can merge the previous patch now, though. Hmm, I'll bet this BUG_ON triggers for Stephen. diff --git a/mm/slqb.c b/mm/slqb.c index a651843..e4b3859 100644 --- a/mm/slqb.c +++ b/mm/slqb.c @@ -1391,6 +1391,7 @@ static noinline void *__slab_alloc_page(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n; n = s->node_slab[slqb_page_to_nid(page)]; + BUG_ON(!n); l = &n->list; page->list = l; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
