Hi Greg, On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:15:19 -0700 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > They were all posted on the linux-usb mailing list, as they are a new > USB controller (for USB 3.0), so they didn't need to be sent to lkml. > > But yes, the code does still need work, that is known, but a build > failure wasn't known :) This is what I tell maintainers of new trees being integrated into linux-next: "all patches/commits in the tree/series must have been: posted to a relevant mailing list reviewed unit tested destined for the next merge window (or the current release) *before* they are included. The linux-next tree is for integration testing and to lower the impact of conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary." -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpVm8zUruoQS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
