* Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:21:39 +0530 > Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:25:33 +0200 > > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> * Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> Today's next tree build(s390 allmodconfig) failed with > > >>> > > >>> kernel/built-in.o: In function `trace_softirq_entry' > > >>> include/trace/events/irq.h:42: undefined reference to > > >>> `' > > >>> include/trace/events/irq.h:42: undefined reference to > > >>> `__tracepoint_softirq_entry' > > >>> kernel/built-in.o: In function `trace_softirq_exit': > > >>> include/trace/events/irq.h:48: undefined reference to > > >>> `__tracepoint_softirq_exit' > > >>> include/trace/events/irq.h:48: undefined reference to > > >>> `__tracepoint_softirq_exit' > > >>> > > >> Hm, that's weird - s390 does not build kernel/softirq.o? Hm, it does > > >> - softirq.o is an obj-y object. > > > > > > s390 does build kernel/softirq.o. However it's anything but obvious to > > > me how the tracepoint infrastructure works. Too many #ifdefs, #define's > > > and #undefine's... > > > > > > I would expect that struct __tracepoint_softirq_entry somehow gets > > > defined via one of the TRACE_FORMAT macros, no? > > Today's next tree also has this failure. Any solution for this problem ? > > Ingo, could you pick up the patch below please? applied, thanks Heiko! Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
