Hi ALexis, On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:37:43 +0200 Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ian Abott told me that the original Comedi CVS tree will not integrate > such a code change. He suggested me to redirect my mail to linux-next > as the staging area is supposed to host any "cleanup effort". He is mistaken about linux-next: no development work goes on there, just integration testing. All staging tree work needs to be directed to Greg (as this was). Also, are we going to have problems if the original developers of things in the staging tree are unwilling to take updates back into their trees? Or is this just a procedural thing i.e. do they only want things fed back after they have been in the staging tree? Will this change if their work ends up in the kernel proper? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpjWYMD76kNb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
