On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 18:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:08:50 am Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 22:25 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > > > > > > In any case, this patch does not belong in the NFS tree since it touches > > > > > > > generic library code, not NFS code. Benny, if nobody else wants to > > > > > > > shepherd it, then just send it directly to Linus. > > ... > > > > The nfs tree should be dropped on the floor immediately until this issue > > > > is resolved. > > > > > > Whatever... > > > > FWIW Trond, I would have taken the patch and pushed it. It > > happens: it's not your fault, but it suddenly became your problem. > > To double check things: is it clear now who pushes the fix and when? > I'm obviously acking it and can push it to Linus if needed. Linus has already merged it as commit a5422a5111811401f7756345e4c237ff06cf6d1e Cheers Trond -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx www.netapp.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
