Re: linux-next: sparc tree build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 07:36:30 +0200

> Would it be possible for you to reserve the extra futex related 
> pointer right now? (or is that not possible without changing the 
> restart block in linux/thread_info.h?)

What are my real options?

No matter what, once you change the size of "struct restart_block"
the sparc64 build will fail, no matter what.

The only way around this is if you merge the thing that changes
the "struct restart_block"'s size to Linus now along with the
sparc64 change at the same time.

But then I have a merge issue I have to resolve in the sparc64
tree because I've already pushed out my dynamic per-cpu work
:-/

Grumble...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux