Re: linux-next: manual merge of the lblnet tree with the security-testing tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 27 March 2009 01:19:57 am Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul, James,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the lblnet tree got a conflict in
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c between commit
> 7198e2eeb44b3fe7cc97f997824002da47a9c644 ("smack: convert smack to
> standard linux lists") from the security-testing tree and commits
> c5b5a2a5e23a0056c76b2084ae2001e55816778a ("netlabel: Cleanup the
> Smack/NetLabel code to fix incoming TCP connections") and
> 174531a7a4f47f47dd706985d3d5e489fec87ab2 ("smack: Add a new '-CIPSO'
> option to the network address label configuration") from the lblnet tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below - I am not entirely sure it is correct) and can
> carry the fix as necessary.

Thanks, I'll take care of it today.  The problem is most likely due to the 
"netlabel: Cleanup ..." patch as it needs to relocate the smack_host_label() 
function higher in the source file as it is need earlier.

Also, just as a heads-up, I'm going to be posting the labeled networking 
patches for 2.6.30 later this afternoon which should help in the future (they 
are typically pulled in via James' security-testing tree).

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux