Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  Hi,

  thanks for the updated disassembly.

>   55bab0:       82 10 60 01     or  %g1, 1, %g1
>                 spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>   55bab4:       40 06 4b 20     call  6ee734 <_spin_unlock>
>   55bab8:       c2 24 e0 28     st  %g1, [ %l3 + 0x28 ]
  OK, so it really seems that:
  jinode->i_flags |= JI_COMMIT_RUNNING;
  spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);

  has been compiled to
  ld [ %l3 + 0x28 ], %g1
  or  %g1, 1, %g1
  call  6ee734 <_spin_unlock>
  st  %g1, [ %l3 + 0x28 ]

  Which seems like a bug in the compiler or in the way implement compiler
barriers in spin_unlock() on UP sparc. Or is there some sparc magic by which
this is correct code? Any clever sparc guy?

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux