On Friday 13 March 2009 01:32:52 am Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced these
> warnings:
>
> In file included from net/ipv4/ip_options.c:26:
> include/net/cipso_ipv4.h: In function 'cipso_v4_req_delattr':
> include/net/cipso_ipv4.h:264: warning: 'return' with a value, in function
> returning void In file included from net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c:22:
> include/net/cipso_ipv4.h: In function 'cipso_v4_req_delattr':
> include/net/cipso_ipv4.h:264: warning: 'return' with a value, in function
> returning void
Thanks, those should now be fixed.
> Caused by commit d584c27edca286826e9145a3158f03e3bc81a6c0 ("netlabel:
> Label incoming TCP connections correctly in SELinux"). (BTW, that commit
> has no Signed-off-by.)
Yes, there are two or three patches in the lblnet-2.6_next tree that do not
currently have sign-offs. These patches are still undergoing review (RFC
patches) and I'm not yet comfortable seeing these patches hit mainline and I
found leaving off a sign-off is about the only reliable way to prevent patches
from being merged.
I've included these RFC patches in the lblnet-2.6_next tree as a way to try
and determine any merge difficulties with other upcoming work in advance as I
do expect the patches to be signed-off for the 2.6.30 window. If that goes
against the current -next policy let me know and I'll remove them.
Thanks.
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
