Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 09:26:43AM -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
> On Sunday 21 December 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:42:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > (Just cc'ing Sam)
> > >
> > > On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:31:10 -0800 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:33:35AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > >
> > > > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > x86_64-linux-ld: drivers/net/wimax/built-in.o: No such file: No such
> > > > > file or directory
> > > > >
> > > > > I reverted commit 66aa675719ab82a03a66b75210fd40be6541f8fb ("wimax:
> > > > > Makefile, Kconfig and docbook linkage for the stack") just to make
> > > > > the build work.
> > > >
> > > > Inaky, any ideas?  This really looks like a build system error that I
> > > > ran into with the staging tree in the past.  I had to add a "dummy"
> > > > file to the empty directory to get it to build properly.
> > > >
> > > > I tried to duplicate the problem with a sample patch, but never could
> > > > :(
> >
> > Incidentally I sent some review comments to said patch yesterday
> > but missed this one.
> >
> > We have:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/Makefile b/drivers/net/wimax/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..bda9430
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wimax/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_WIMAX_I2400M)	+= i2400m/
> >
> >
> >
> > But the problem here is that because we do not even pretend to
> > build some files in this dir thus kbuild does not create build-in.o
> >
> > The fix is a bit ugly but simple. Add a dummy statement to
> > the drivers/net/wimax/Makefile like this:
> >
> > # force kbuild to create built-in.o
> > obj- := dummy.o
> 
> ops -- ok, I will. I guess I have to add this in all the similar ones, right?
> 
> Greg, do you want a new patch series or just another patch on top?

Just a single replacement patch for when we add this makefile is fine
with me.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux