Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Should include/linux/buffer_head.h have an empty stub for fsync_super() > or does fscache even make sense when CONFIG_BLOCK=n? FS-Cache might. CacheFiles probably doesn't. There've been discussions about a separate caching backend to deal with non-rotating media such as large chunks of battery-backed RAM or flash. FS-Cache might make sense in such a situation as these could be accessed in other ways (such as through MTD or even directly). I'll make CONFIG_CACHEFILES dependent on CONFIG_BLOCK. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
