On Thursday 18 December 2008 09:24:19 Mike Travis wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > Like cpu_coregroup_map, but returns a (const) pointer. > > > > (This will go to Ingo separately as part of the x86 series, just > > airing it here for thoroughness). > > > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I've pulled this patch into the queue for my cpus4096-for-ingo tree. > > [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86 > > I can also line up a queue for sched related changes: > > [PATCH 4/4] cpumask: Replace cpu_coregroup_map with cpu_coregroup_map() > > Is there any status on the corresponding changes for sparc, s390? (I assume > that they'll need to be merged into linux-next?) > > [PATCH 2/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): sparc > [PATCH 3/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): s390 You can't take 4/4 until 2/4 and 3/4 are merged, and since it's not x86-specific as well, we'll leave it in my tree. Thanks, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
