Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got a lot of conflict in
> include/linux/audit.h, kernel/auditsc.c, kernel/capability.c and
> security/commoncap.c against commits in the security-testing tree.
> 
> Its not obvious how to resolve these, so can you, Eric, James and Dave
> have a conversation and see what you can come up with.  Some will be
> easy, but there are several overlapping changes here.
> 
> Looking harder, it looks like some (all?) of Eric's patches may already
> be in the security-testing tree ...
> 
> I have dropped the audit tree for today.

I've looked at all the conflicting bits, and I think you should take what's in
the security tree over what's in Al's tree for all of them.  I think the
security tree already has everything that Al's tree applies in the conflicting
areas, it's just that the security tree has further changes parked on top.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux