On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Paul Moore wrote: > James, is the security-testing tree rebased regularly or is suitable to > back a tree against? No, it doesn't get rebased. > If so, I can rebase the lblnet-2.6_next tree > against security-testing to resolve the conflict ... Ok, and I can carry your patches in there if necessary. -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
