On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:06:35PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05 2008, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> >
> > your patch "aio: make the lookup_ioctx() lockless" in linux-next
> > causes this build bug on s390:
> >
> > arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c: In function 's390_enable_sie':
> > arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c:266: error: invalid operands to binary || (have 'int' and 'struct hlist_head')
> > arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c:282: error: invalid operands to binary || (have 'int' and 'struct hlist_head')
> > make[1]: *** [arch/s390/mm/pgtable.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [arch/s390/mm] Error 2
> >
> > Could you please fix that? Thanks! ;)
>
> Something like this?
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
> index ef3635b..0767827 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ int s390_enable_sie(void)
> /* lets check if we are allowed to replace the mm */
> task_lock(tsk);
> if (!tsk->mm || atomic_read(&tsk->mm->mm_users) > 1 ||
> - tsk->mm != tsk->active_mm || tsk->mm->ioctx_list) {
> + tsk->mm != tsk->active_mm || !hlist_empty(&tsk->mm->ioctx_list)) {
> task_unlock(tsk);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ int s390_enable_sie(void)
> /* Now lets check again if something happened */
> task_lock(tsk);
> if (!tsk->mm || atomic_read(&tsk->mm->mm_users) > 1 ||
> - tsk->mm != tsk->active_mm || tsk->mm->ioctx_list) {
> + tsk->mm != tsk->active_mm || !hlist_empty(&tsk->mm->ioctx_list)) {
> mmput(mm);
> task_unlock(tsk);
> return -EINVAL;
Yes, exactly. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
