* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Ingo Molnar (mingo@xxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > the other direction (you merging ftrace bits) doesnt look too hot, > > > > you'd have to pick up: > > > > > > > > 95 files changed, 5308 insertions(+), 1603 deletions(-) > > > > > > Lets do that, it's just a single patch here from Arnaldo. I have > > > attached it to this email. > > > > thanks, here's the conversion to tracepoints below. Stephen, you might > > want to pick up the blk tree straight away plus the fix below. > > I guess the only difference between your implementation and mine is > that you define all the tracepoints in block/blktrace.c, while I > define them in the various files where they are used. I don't feel > very strongly opinioned about any of the two alternatives. usage site build attribute must be the same as definition site attribute. So blktrace.c is not a good place - we will fail the build in the !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE case. I'll apply your spread-out definition variant. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
