Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cputime tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 20:21 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the cputime tree got a conflict in
> kernel/sched.c between commit 74fcd524e808975dd546dac847119f1995a7c622
> ("account_steal_time: kill the unneeded account_group_system_time()")
> from the tip-core tree and commit
> b7f4776b7f575ed8f288c44b64befd241fd44458 ("[PATCH] idle cputime
> accounting") from the cputime tree.
> 
> The latter removes the call to account_group_system_time() as a side
> effect of further changes.  So the fixup is to just take the latter
> change.  I can carry the merge fix.

Martin,

Why does s390 do its own cpu accounting?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux