* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:44:16 -0500 Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Yep, it was the wrong constraint used in the asm. Googling around, I > > found a similar bug listed in gcc, which was not a bug. > > Amazing what we trip over :-( > > > Patch has been sent to fix this. > > Can you put that patch in your tree as well, or will it reach > linux-next quickly enough anyway? i've applied the assembly constraint fix to the x86 tree and i've integrated a new version of auto-x86-next which includes the fix, and pushed it out. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
