Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the ftrace tree got a conflict in
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c between commits
> 820432783190b4096499e38a4a4d7095c511913d ("ftrace: make filtered
> functions effective on setting") and
> 32464779a1b8c15e9aa9aa0306b2f735080df9d8 ("ftrace: fix dyn ftrace filter
> selection") from Linus' tree and commit ftrace_startup ("ftrace: add
> quick function trace stop") from the ftrace tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below - which may not be correct) but it needs to be
> fixed in the ftrace tree.

hm, latest tip/auto-ftrace-next has no merge commit with -git. But i 
reintegrated it about an hour before you sent this mail - maybe you've 
got the old branch still?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux