Re: linux-next: cpu_alloc tree patch (Was: Re: next-20081106: undefined reference to `__per_cpu_start')

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> I have applied this to linux-next today.  It is not clear to me if this
> is a fix for the cpu_alloc tree or the zero-based per_cpu area patches or
> a combination of both.  If the first, please apply this to the cpu_alloc
> tree or I will have to drop the tree.  Otherwise, let me know where it
> belongs.

Its a fix to the cpu_alloc stuff.

> Also, considering the "discussions" between Rusty and yourself, I may
> need to drop the cpu_alloc tree until they are resolved.

Just came back from the conference. Hope I can catch up with email soon.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux