2008/11/15 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2008/11/15 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Fri, Nov 14 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote: >>> WARNING: at block/blk-barrier.c:246 blk_do_ordered+0x22b/0x26a() >>> Modules linked in: >>> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.28-rc4-next-20081114 #3 >>> Call Trace: >>> <IRQ> [<ffffffff80236d63>] warn_on_slowpath+0x58/0x7d >>> [<ffffffff802570e3>] ? mark_lock+0x1c/0x37a >>> [<ffffffff803a69f9>] ? elv_rb_del+0x30/0x4b >>> [<ffffffff803b1092>] ? cfq_remove_request+0x180/0x1d8 >>> [<ffffffff803afd03>] ? __cfq_slice_expired+0xd6/0xeb >>> [<ffffffff803afd31>] ? cfq_slice_expired+0x19/0x1b >>> [<ffffffff803b1832>] ? cfq_dispatch_requests+0x2c1/0x37e >>> [<ffffffff803aa98c>] blk_do_ordered+0x22b/0x26a >>> [<ffffffff803a6560>] elv_next_request+0x1d0/0x210 >>> [<ffffffff80439c7c>] scsi_request_fn+0x9e/0x539 >>> [<ffffffff80255c66>] ? put_lock_stats+0xe/0x27 >>> [<ffffffff803a827e>] blk_invoke_request_fn+0x3b/0x6e >>> [<ffffffff803a87fd>] __blk_run_queue+0x25/0x29 >>> [<ffffffff803a8822>] blk_run_queue+0x21/0x35 >>> [<ffffffff80439509>] scsi_run_queue+0x2cf/0x379 >>> [<ffffffff8043a33e>] scsi_next_command+0x36/0x46 >>> [<ffffffff8043a509>] scsi_end_request+0x92/0xa4 >>> [<ffffffff8043aae7>] scsi_io_completion+0x1a7/0x3ad >>> [<ffffffff80434551>] scsi_finish_command+0xe9/0xf2 >>> [<ffffffff8043afd5>] scsi_softirq_done+0x10e/0x117 >>> [<ffffffff803ac393>] blk_done_softirq+0x7f/0x8f >>> [<ffffffff8023c173>] __do_softirq+0x70/0x101 >>> [<ffffffff8020cc0c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28 >>> [<ffffffff8020e229>] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a >>> [<ffffffff8023bd78>] irq_exit+0x45/0xa2 >>> [<ffffffff8020e53a>] do_IRQ+0x16a/0x19c >>> [<ffffffff8020bceb>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf >>> <EOI> [<ffffffff80212e09>] ? mwait_idle+0x3e/0x48 >>> [<ffffffff80212e00>] ? mwait_idle+0x35/0x48 >>> [<ffffffff8020a940>] ? cpu_idle+0x51/0xba >>> [<ffffffff80514f9c>] ? rest_init+0x70/0x72 >>> ---[ end trace 115cb4be7e150bb9 ]--- >> >> I'm assuming this is new with -next and doesn't happen with 2.6.28-rc4? > Yes. >> Is it reproducible in -next? > I have seen it only once yet. I have the same warning on 2.6.28-rc5-next-20081117, reproducible on dbench. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
