Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 04:29:41PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/proc/base.c:2547: error: 'pid_stack' undeclared here (not in a function)
> 
> Caused by an interaction of commits
> 078e9901c02d4899db5b24f708b8dfbca8935891 ("stacktrace:
> add /proc/<pid>/stack to dump task's stack trace") and
> 35f0b5fd7fab907a1119eaa614d9b24e5e225755 ("stacktrace:
> convert /proc/<pid>/stack to seqfiles") from the tip-core tree with commit
> 5d8880e3e0fb96459c652ac5e1504b90c949b3b9 ("proc: remove '##' usage") from
> the proc tree.
> 
> The former added a new usage of INF (which the second converted to a
> ONE).  I added the following patch to the merge of the proc tree and can
> carry it.

Time to steal this /proc/*/stack from Ingo. :-)

> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -2544,7 +2544,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[] = {
>  	INF("wchan",      S_IRUGO, proc_pid_wchan),
>  #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
> -	ONE("stack",      S_IRUSR, pid_stack),
> +	ONE("stack",      S_IRUSR, proc_pid_stack),

correct
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux