RE: next-20081107: ia64 vs kvm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On ia64-smp-n-debug-n-preempt-n:
> 
> arch/ia64/kvm/vmm.c:63: error: 'raw_spinlock_t' has no member named
> 'lock' 
> 
Hi, Avi
	This patch should fix the issue Alex met, please apply to kvm.git and queue it for 2.6.28 fixes. Thanks!
Xiantao

>From fae5782b369f4bd6e8edecad5912fea7624f0374 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:46:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: IA64: Fix vmm_spin_{un}lock for !CONFIG_SMP.

In the case of !CONFIG_SMP, raw_spinlock_t has no any member
so vmm_spin_lock should also defines the version for !CONFIG_SMP.

Signed-off-by: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/ia64/kvm/vcpu.h |    5 +++++
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/vcpu.h b/arch/ia64/kvm/vcpu.h
index 341e3fe..e9b2a4e 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kvm/vcpu.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/vcpu.h
@@ -384,6 +384,10 @@ static inline u64 __gpfn_is_io(u64 gpfn)
 #define MODE_IND(psr)	\
 	(((psr).it << 2) + ((psr).dt << 1) + (psr).rt)
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
+#define _vmm_raw_spin_lock(x)	 do {}while(0)
+#define _vmm_raw_spin_unlock(x) do {}while(0)
+#else
 #define _vmm_raw_spin_lock(x)						\
 	do {								\
 		__u32 *ia64_spinlock_ptr = (__u32 *) (x);		\
@@ -403,6 +407,7 @@ static inline u64 __gpfn_is_io(u64 gpfn)
 	do { barrier();				\
 		((spinlock_t *)x)->raw_lock.lock = 0; } \
 while (0)
+#endif
 
 void vmm_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock);
 void vmm_spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock);
-- 
1.6.0

Attachment: 0001-KVM-IA64-Fix-vmm_spin_-un-lock-for-CONFIG_SMP.patch
Description: 0001-KVM-IA64-Fix-vmm_spin_-un-lock-for-CONFIG_SMP.patch


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux